For
those of us—and there are untold legions—who
worship at the font of WAG’s
patron saint, Oscar Wilde, it was a promising sign
when a new film adaptation of his last and greatest
play, The Importance of Being Earnest, played
before large crowds this past spring. That an intricate,
cunning period comedy could get a sizeable audience
in the season of Spiderman and Star Wars:
Attack of the Clones is heartening, indeed. But
discerning Wildeans should know that a far greater
happening is upon us: the original 1952 film adaptation
of The Importance of Being Earnest has been
released on DVD on the incomparable Criterion label,
and it gives us a chance to watch one of the greatest
stage-to-cinema productions in a sharper print than
has been available for decades.
Wilde
began writing The Importance of Being Earnest
in August 1894, and it premiered six months later
on St. Valentine’s Day, as Wilde was facing
increasingly angry verbal attacks from his lover’s
father, the Marquess of Queensbury. (Had it not
been for Wilde and the public accusations of sodomy
made against him, the Marquess would be known today
solely for his standardization of boxing rules.)
Two weeks later, Wilde unwisely pressed criminal
libel charges against the Marquess. Improbably,
Wilde actually attended the March 7 performance
of The Importance of Being Earnest with
his lover (Lord Alfred Douglas) and his wife together.
(Wilde’s biographer, Richard Ellmann, reports
that Wilde’s wife "had tears in her eyes.")
On
April 5, after the libel charges were dismissed
(on the grounds that Queensbury’s accusations
were true), Wilde was arrested and charged with
committing sodomy and indecent acts, the evidence
for which had been brought out by Queenbury’s
legal defense. A month later, Wilde was found guilty
of all charges but one, and he was sentenced to
the maximum two years of hard labor. He died three
years after his release, an exile in Paris, at the
age of forty-six.
That
The Importance of Being Earnest’s effortless
composition and critically acclaimed premiere coincided
with Wilde’s public downfall is striking,
to say the least, and it’s hard not to note
at least in passing the ironically polarized parallels
between Wilde’s life and the play. According
to Wilde, the play’s philosophy was "That
we should treat all trivial things very seriously,
and all the serious things of life with sincere
and studied triviality." Wilde’s well-being
would doubtless have been better served by taking
the play’s philosophy to heart: tear up Queensbury’s
offending notes, shrug off his slurs and spend a
little time abroad while the scandal died down.
But under Douglas’s influence, Wilde pressed
on with the charges, and it wasn’t until the
case had advanced too far to turn back that he realized
how serious the repercussions against him might
be, given how easily the Marquess’s claims
could be proven true.
Flight,
though it was adamantly suggested (and arranged)
by many friends, seems never to have been a real
consideration for Wilde once he faced his own criminal
trials, and at least some of his contemporaries
admired him for it. "He was an unfinished sketch
of a great man," Yeats said of him, "and
showed great courage and manhood amid the collapse
of his fortunes." Courageous as his unflinching
stance may have been once he faced criminal charges,
the notion that he was unfinished seems particularly
apt for describing Wilde’s inability to understand
the seemingly obvious drawbacks to his pressing
the initial libel suit. It was a singularly damning
failing that suggests an intriguing mix of hubris
and naivete. While The Importance of Being Earnest’s
Jack and Algernon eventually learn to play cunning
political games in the adult world to fulfill their
hedonistic desires, Wilde himself failed utterly
to learn the lesson.
Ironically,
the prospect of imprisonment arises in an early
draft of The Importance of Being Earnest.
In an act that Wilde eventually cut (and which found
its way in abbreviated form into this year’s
film adaptation), Algernon is threatened with arrest
for unpaid restaurant bills. Unlike Wilde, Algernon
is able to scoff at the prospect of imprisonment—and
avoid it. "I am not going to be imprisoned
in the suburbs for dining in the West End,"
he says. "It is ridiculous."
An
odd thread connects Wilde to Anthony Asquith, the
director of the 1952 film adaptation of The
Importance of Being Earnest. Asquith’s
father, a progressive who served as Britain’s
prime minister from 1909 to 1916, had known Wilde
socially, but as Home Secretary, he was involved
in the prosecution’s criminal case against
Wilde. (He was actually one of the officials who
signed Wilde’s arrest warrant.) Anthony himself
shrugged off his aristocratic background with an
eccentric austerity (he wore his WWII British Home
Guard uniform on his film sets for thirty years),
but growing up as a member of Wilde’s privileged
class clearly helped his celluloid presentation
of Wilde’s satirical subjects.
As
film historian Bruce Eder observes in the notes
that accompany the photo gallery on the Criterion
DVD, Asquith’s The Importance of Being
Earnest was among the last great movies to
come out of the British film industry post-WWII,
and it also marked the zenith of the Rank Organisation’s
association with theatrical works. The screenplay
is strikingly close to Wilde’s original text;
only the most historically obscure lines are deleted
or altered.
Asquith’s
direction—which respects the film’s
theatrical origins without making it feel stage-bound—is
pitch-perfect. But the film’s most remarkable
feature is its cast. Michael Redgrave (as Jack)
and Michael Denison (as Algernon) are delightfully
buoyant and reflect none of the peculiar morbidity
under which both Colin Firth and Rupert Everett
seem to act in the new adaptation. Dame Edith Evans
is definitive as Lady Bracknell (she played the
role for thirty years on stage before appearing
in the film, so we shouldn’t be surprised).
And Dorothy Tutin and Joan Greenwood, who play Jack
and Algernon’s love interests, mix childlike
frivolity and maternal sternness in equal amounts—which
is actually no mean feat, when you think about it.
Asquith had worked with Redgrave and Margaret Rutherford
(Miss Prism) before (and would work with Rutherford
again), and that experience along with his appreciation
for the stage (as well as his earlier stage-to-cinema
projects like Pygmalion and The Browning
Version) paid healthy dividends.
The
Criterion DVD doesn’t have an audio commentary,
but the Eder notes that accompany the photos section
are informative and help place both the play and
the film in their historical context. The print’s
Technicolor is breathtakingly bright (its shows
off the lovely sets nicely), and although the image
is a bit grainy at times, it is certainly an improvement
over the print previously available on videotape.
Indeed, the DVD’s only problem is its sound.
For a film whose best feature—the spoken word—relies
so much on sound quality, it comes up a bit short
on volume, I think.
A
final note: If you’re new to Wilde and would
like something more overtly thought-provoking, consider
reading his 1890 novel, A Picture of Dorian
Gray.
|